Hi.
You've described the company's activities. That's good.
The key is missing—design.
"Open to everything" is too vague. We designers can't know how you envision your brand. Friendly or businesslike, strict or intriguing, trusting or exclusive, etc.
This is important because visual language has its own rules. They dictate the choice of typography, symbolism, and execution technique.
If you can't describe it in your own words, at least add the names of companies whose logos you personally like.

Designers will be able to understand the direction they should work in. Currently, the brief doesn't sound like "This is who we are, this is what we want," but rather "Work hard from here until lunchtime."

Submission ID: #4117363
Thank you for reviewing my submission. Please take a moment to read the pitch below, as it explains how the monogram gives WATCHGEMS a memorable identity while staying flexible across different products and selling platforms.

Dear Project Owner,
Please have a look at all my submissions. Your rating and feedback would be truly appreciated.
thank you

@KAPITOSHKA : Thank you for taking time to always write such pertinent commentaries - you always ask the right questions!
Unfortunately 99% of the project owners do not understand how design works and end up with hundreds of generic proposals.
Without a detailed brief and without answering questions from designers and giving feedback, there will be no good result.
We are designers, not mind readers. Hope in this case the project owner will take a few minutes to answer us.

Hi)
You're welcome.
I'm all for thoughtful and interesting design. Even in competitions. Although that's tricky here.
As for questions... it's easier to ask once than 10 times to rework them later)))
I wish the administration would listen it's time to do something about this situation. A good brief is 50% of good design.

Absolutely! It would save time and money on both ends (more happy clients plus less refunds)

Only truly rich people save time and money.

I don't think they're here)))
"We want a timeless, premium, expensive, super-duper logo like Apple, Porsche, Bang & Olufsen—but not like them. An original, unique, and universally cool logo that will be relevant in 100 years. For $150.)))"

Please feedback for any change needed to my submitted concepts, thank you #37525568 #37525344

Please check those design and provide a feedback. Your feedback would be highly appreciated. #37532435, #37532434, #37532357, #37532355, #37532352

Hi,
I've submitted Design Id #37534119 for your consideration. I hope this direction is closer to your vision. I'd appreciate your feedback, and please let me know if there's anything you'd like me to refine. Thank you.